Newsweek: Ed Rendell, Bill Richardson, Lead Insiders Against Dean

A new story from Newsweek by Howard Fineman chronicles some of the machinations party insiders are going through to marginalize a Howard Dean victory for party chair.  Nothing suprising, right?  Well, guess who is leading this pathetic troupe.

Governors Ed Rendell of PA and Bill Richardson of NM.  Two of my FORMERLY favorite governors.

From the article:


Now Playing: 'Anybody But Dean, Part 2'

Then, as now, a party establishment—based in Congress, governors' mansions and Georgetown salons—viewed him as a loudmouthed lefty whose visibility would ruin the Democratic brand in Red States.
...
n the meantime, with the DNC meeting approaching on Feb. 12, party insiders have been conducting an urgent, so far fruitless, search for a consensus Dean-stopper. The Clintons don't like Dean on substance or style, seeing him as too left and too loose-lipped. But they're being careful. Hillary, already eying a presidential run in 2008, doesn't want to alienate the possible winner; she's leaving DNC maneuvers to Bill, whose answer last month was to sound out current chairman Terry McAuliffe about remaining in the job. (He declined.)
...
Last week the search for a surefire Dean-stopper (if there is one) reached new levels, NEWSWEEK has learned, with several governors—among them Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania and Bill Richardson of New Mexico—trying to gin up a last-ditch plan: let Dean be chairman, but confine his role to pure nuts-and-bolts duties by layering him with a new "general chairman" spokesman for the party.
...
The incendiary quotes are old news, his advisers insist; besides, Dean will concentrate on organization, not provocation. He and Bill Clinton have talked—at length, sources say—and Dean has hired shrewd Washington hands to help him, including Jim Jordan, Kerry's first presidential handler.

What the hell is going on here?  I like the Clintons.  I liked Ed Rendell until he caved to big telecom.  I liked Bill Richardson until this, but if any of this is confirmed by more reputable reporters than Howard Fineman, I'm going to have to rethink my support for these people.  The Clinton's too.



Display:


I am still undecided... (none / 0)

Im not sure who I want for DNC chair.  At first I thought Dean for sure. Then I realized that Dean being DNC chair is like shooting craps in Las Vegas.  If everything goes according to his plan Democrats should do very well in 2006 and 2008.  If things go wrong we will be in big trouble.  Im sure the right wing media will blast Dean and Democrats for choosing him.  Is the risk worth the reward?  On the other hand, I cant think of anyone else besides Dean who I like even a little bit.
by nickshepDEM on Sun Jan 23, 2005 at 01:10:31 PM EST

Re: I am still undecided... (none / 0)

WHAT RISK?

We're already in BIG TROUBLE.  It is time Dems face the truth and acknowledge that what we've been doing is not working.  Aside from Dean, there are few candidates who offer anything other than the status quo.  Only one thing is for sure, if we continue on this path where we're already in BIG TROUBLE... we'll only find ourselves in even BIGGER TROUBLE.

Dean offers a way out.  Let's take it.

by manyoso on Sun Jan 23, 2005 at 01:16:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I am still undecided... (none / 0)

I certainly agree that our current strategy is not working. We cannot be Republican-lite, run safe and to the center, and expect to win a majority any time soon.

We have forsaken the working class for corporate money. We cannot give up on gun control, choice, deregulation, Republican corruption, unending war in the Middle East, freedom from religion, the forwardinig of civil rights, and privacy rights. There's already a party that stands for that, and they do it better.

All a Howard Dean victory means is the prospect of trying something different in the face of failure. I agree that a Dean victory would be marginal. I've posted before that McAulliffe was the first DNC chair in my life who's name I knew. The fact that Dean's an outsider is significant.

I'm certainly willing to give him the opportunity to try something different. Hitting ourselves in the head with a hammer is sure getting old. But he hasn't won anything yet, and I wouldn't say that he should bring us victory in 2006 or 2008.

by JohnGor0 on Sun Jan 23, 2005 at 01:46:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I am still undecided... (none / 0)

If the DNC runs half as well as DFA's local and start effort ran, we'll be fine.

DFA did fairly well running candidates deep in red country.  If we can take the DFA success and liaise it with the success of the emerging Mountain West libertarian wing of the party, the Dems could turn this around.

And, frankly, the GOP is handing us an anti-corruption platform for 2006.

by jcjcjc on Sun Jan 23, 2005 at 01:20:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

No easty answers (none / 0)

There are no easy answers to the Democrat's
dilemma.  We need a party leader who is
outspoken and articulate, however the main
role of DNC chairman is organizing,
fund-raising and recruiting candidates.
Dean is capable of this role, but there
are others who may emerge.  We have to
emerge as the party of doing what is right.

We also need candidates who will not play
the status quo.  My hat goes off to
Sen. Barbara Boxer, a true leader for the
party and the country.  We must also forget
about another candidate from the northeast
and southeast.   So let's send the signal
to end the Senator Clinton talk.   Bill
did a fine job as President and if the
citizens of New York want her as Sentator
great, but not more Bush or Clinton presidencies.

Whoever leads the party and our candidates
must have strong aggressive personalities.
Politics is brutal and our candidate must
be willing to play hardball.   Issues
and realignment will not bring progessives
or Democrats back to power.  

We need to start looking westward for a
strong leader to lead the Democrats out of
the wilderness.  I like Governor Richardson,
but is he running interference for the Clinton's?
He has the potential to be a good Presidential
candidate himself.  Senator Boxer is definetly
sounding the right notes as well.  
A strong western governor is the dream to pull
Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Montana.

by ncpatriot04 on Sun Jan 23, 2005 at 02:29:13 PM EST

OT: (none / 0)

I never did hear which School and when you graduated or pledged.  Got the chapter designation but I have no clue which site that is.  I was Missouri (Beta Beta Chapter - BB) and pledged in 96.
http://www.imvotingrepublican.com/ McCain Sucks!
by yitbos96bb on Mon Jan 24, 2005 at 02:36:05 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.